Blog Widget by LinkWithin

« NC147 pedestrian bridge rises over freeway tonight | Main | Parents gird for school budget battle as DPS shakes the cushion »

March 17, 2010

Comments

Skeptic

Why are we dying for a corporate giant to provide a public good? Does nobody have a problem with this begging for scraps from the table?

FWIW

@skeptic: Uh, not really, no.

I think it's pretty cool, and am thankful to those in the community who are devoting their time and energy to this effort.

Will

Great post Kevin. I echo what you've said and would add that while some cities across the country have been grabbing media attention through outrageous stunts like changing the names of their towns to Google or having a mayor jump in an icy lake (really not sure how that relates) Durham has gone about our effort just as you've said, in a community-civic-corporate grassroots way that shows Durham is already a good fit for Google.

Now to find a shirt to wear for tomorrow....

The WidowMaker, maker

My Pitch to Google:
Since Durham is home to the fastest toboggan-sled ever built (The Widow-Maker) it only seems fitting that it should have the fastest network ever built... then I sent them the link.

Myers Sugg

I don't mind begging if there is no political will to do this publicly (and perhaps that isn't a good idea anyway) or privately otherwise. Verizon and its fiber product (FIOS) abandoned Durham with its soon to close "sale" to under capitalized, and unsophisticated telcom, "Frontier Communications." Time Warner, I just don't know. Seems to me that technology and lack of investment by TW, will keep their speeds slow comparatively. I know some talk about wireless connectivity, but I'm just not convinced of decent speeds, and reliability. So, why not Google? It's my understanding that if they do what they say they will do, that this will be a fee for service venture. It's not like we are begging them as much, if we are willing to pay to participate. It's just that they seem (on the surface) to be willing to make the investment, when others won't or can't.

Myers Sugg

Myers Sugg

I should have said, "It's not like we are begging for charity, if we are willing to pay to participate."

Leigh

hell yeah I'll beg if I get a lightning fast Internet connection and finally get a viable alternative to the evil Time Warner Cable. Any economic stimulus for the local economy is just gravy.

Matt Drew

@Myers Sugg: the technology exists for Time Warner to provide much higher speeds (DOCSIS 3). They just don't, because they have a de-facto monopoly on cable and cable-based internet access in North Carolina, which means they have zero incentive to increase service or lower prices. That's because of the restrictions on competition that were put in place in the 70's, such as exclusive cable franchises, and the lack of real competitiveness of DSL technologies.

This is precisely the kind of private infrastructure competition that we should have had for decades, and it's an excellent start to getting our broadband providers back on track to improving service and lowering costs instead of jacking our rates every year.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment