Blog Widget by LinkWithin

« BCR's Daily Fishwrap Report for November 12, 2009 | Main | BCR's Daily Fishwrap Report for November 13, 2009 »

November 12, 2009

Comments

Rob

It will be interesting to see how this plays out in Durham. It's going to get weird when the Durham Committee lines up with the tea-baggers once more.

Transit is really important if we want to see RTP attract even more corporate HQs. Growth in RTP is definitely a good thing for Durham County. Additionally, Duke employs a large number of folks from out of the county; it would be very beneficial for the environment to get these employees using transit instead of one person/one car.

Todd P

Durham's 'food tax' referendum was doomed from the start due to the list of questionable projects slated to be funded, not due the tax itself. Politically connected groups larded up the list with niche projects without broad support among the general population.

The transit tax already starts with a larger base of support than the baseball museum, county stadium, civic center, and Hayti projects ever had. Lots of people recognize the value of mass transit programs.

Transit supporters still have work to do, but the bar is not as high as it was last time. The key will be to have a solid, widely supported plan in place for how the money is to be spent - with little wiggle room for elected boards to redirect the money to politically connected projects. Durham voters have seen that happen too many times with bond money for parks and roads.

Mark H

How much money are we talking about needing to be raised per year?

David Neal

The General Assembly predicts that the 1/2 cent sales tax revenue from the Triangle as a whole would amount to about $72 million ($16 million from Durham). An additional $10 million could be generated by additional vehicle registration fees ($1.8 million from Durham). Those funds would then attract additional federal dollars to support regional transit. I do not know how much it would actually cost to implement the STAC transit plan - but the local funds are the start.

http://www.ncleg.net/Sessions/2009/FiscalNotes/House/PDF/HFN0148v4n1.pdf

Ed Harrison

David,

You omitted me.

As the only person in the room who's won election campaigns both County-wide in Durham County (with Durham Committee endorsements) and Town-wide in Chapel Hill -- three of each -- I might just be able to offer some insights into how to run a Durham-Orange campaign. That may or may not be the way to run it, since the referenda would be separate, but the elections will likely be simultaneous, the goal is regional in nature, and the market in certain key media is larger than one county.

Ed Harrison
Chapel Hill Town Council Member 2001-2013
with Durham my county seat for four decades
Transit user since 1957

David Neal

Ed,
Sorry I missed you - but glad that you are willing to help lead the charge! Thanks for chiming in and I will be sure to amend the OrangePolitics posting as well.
David

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment